Abstract (Expand)
COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted the healthcare and economy on a global scale. It is widely recognized that mass testing is an efficient way to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as … aid in the development of informed policies for disease management. However, the current COVID-19 worldwide infection rates increased the demand for rapid and reliable screening of infection.
We compared the performance of qRT-PCR in direct heat-inactivated (H), heat-inactivated and pelleted (HC) samples against RNA in a group of 74 subjects (44 positive and 30 negative). Then we compared the sensitivity of HC in a larger group of 196 COVID-19 positive samples.
Our study suggests that HC samples show higher accuracy for SARS-CoV-2 detection PCR assay compared to direct H (89 % vs 83 % of the detection in RNA). The sensitivity of detection using direct samples varied depending on the sample transport and storage media as well as the viral loads (as measured by qRT-PCR Ct levels).
Altogether, all the data suggest that purified RNA provides more accurate results, however, direct sample testing with qRT-PCR may help to significantly increase testing capacity. Switching to the direct sample testing is justified if the number of tests is doubled at least.
Authors: Diana Avetyan, Andranik Chavushyan, Hovsep Ghazaryan, Ani Melkonyan, Ani Stepanyan, Roksana Zakharyan, Varduhi Hayrapetyan, Sofi Atshemyan, Gisane Khachatryan, Tamara Sirunyan, Suren Davitavyan, Gevorg Martirosyan, Gayane Melik-Andreasyan, Shushan Sargsyan, Armine Ghazazyan, Naira Aleksanyan, Xiushan Yin, Arsen Arakelyan
Date Published: 4th Jun 2021
Publication Type: Journal
